$1.5M cut across air, ocean and parcel with no change of carrier
Years on the same carriers, spot rates that moved every month, and no cost certainty anywhere.
The results our engagements produced for clients like you, and what exactly we did to get there.
Years on the same carriers, spot rates that moved every month, and no cost certainty anywhere.
Their 3PL bundled fulfillment with transportation, so nobody had tested the outbound rates in years.
A parcel renewal sitting on the desk, the number two carrier at the door, and no capacity to run a real bid.
No related results found. Please try simplifying the filters.
Paul and team expertly orchestrated a competitive process with 20+ participants across three rounds, completing the entire project in under three months. Results exceeded expectations.
I knew I had good rates. I had a feeling I could do better, so I called Trans-solutions. They delivered 4x what the incumbent offered.
They would not risk service by putting the freight out to bid. We used peer pricing instead.
A consultant said closing four distribution centers would save millions. They wanted that checked before committing the capital.
Records on paper, track and trace by phone call, and rates nobody had tested in years.
Warehousing looks like a small line item, so nobody re-bids it. Deliveries were inconsistent and costs kept rising.
A flat rack from Malaysia, a low-boy to Turkmenistan. Lanes too specialized for the largest forwarders.
Transportation was outsourced to a provider that preferred keeping its existing carriers over finding better ones. We benchmarked every lane.
Six vendors, over 600 SKUs, and no agreement with the largest supplier. Nobody could see the spend.
Suppliers picked the carriers and marked up the freight, then passed it to franchisees. Nobody was managing it.
The easy answer was to use the parent company’s fulfillment. They wanted to know whether it was the best one.
They wanted to close a warehouse. The question was whether service would survive it, and nobody could price that.
Deliveries were inconsistent, costly and non-compliant, and sales reps were spending their time managing sample inventory.
Freight ate the margin, and every expedited load sent to hit a production schedule wiped out the profit.
Active pallets cost a premium and weigh 635 kilos. Passive ones are cheaper, if the temperature holds.
Down tools cost the customer over $100K an hour, and the depots were missing their service agreements.
A physical count across three continents came up five tanks short, with no way to trace the contents.
Double digit growth against a manual back office, where keeping up meant adding people rather than systems.
No transportation management system does it all, and most buyers overpay for functionality they will never use.
No related results found. Please try simplifying the filters.
Get an instant calculation of your savings potential. Based on the database of carrier contracts we have audited and negotiated for 600+ clients since 1997, and on current benchmark data showing what companies with your profile pay today.